In lesson this week we watched Valerie Steele's keynote speech 'Is fashion art?'. From taking notes from this video (link found bellow) I revised this question and came to my own conclusion on the forever argued debate.
While many people agree that a meticulous haute couture dress can be just as stunning and captivating as a Gogh classic, some of the most famous names in the fashion industry detest the idea that fashion is art, one being Karl Lagerfeld. The question is constantly up for debate, dividing the artists from the fashion appreciators.
What is the difference between Fashion and Art? The primary difference between the two lies in their utility. People may argue that fashion is functional, personal and expresses one's individuality but many disagree and believe that art can in fact do the same thing. I myself, disagree that art can do the same thing.
Yes, art is a form of expression and can be used to display emotion, creativity and exquisite detail just as much as fashion can however to myself it doesn't withheld the practicality that fashion does. For example, when you get up, what is one of the first things you do before embracing the day? Stare at a painting? Create a world famous piece of art worth millions? Possibly.. But you're much more likely to establish a aesthetically pleasing outfit before leaving your house.
I am well aware of the fact that everyone shares different opinions and I respect these entirely. And being the openminded person that I am, appreciate all art and fashion forms, whether they captivate myself or not.
Despite my opinion on the subject, the debate defies a purpose and lack of an easy answer, because like beauty, art is in the eye of the beholder. The world becomes bland and insipid once we start defining anything, let alone what is and isn't art.
Links:
Valerie Steele's keynote speech on 'Is Fashion Art?'
